Bumping minimum jre to 11 #1743
Replies: 5 comments
-
Definitely JDK 17 should be considered yes, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@sameb I'd opt for 17 for future versions |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
17 is an interesting question, it's just not the one I'm ready to ask about. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I was working with the idea that JDK 11 is EOL in September this year :) I understand but seems a bit of a waste of effort? It's really about being able to build native Java applications without a damn fat-jar and using the modular pathways instead of the "classpath" ;) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
FYI, the minimum is now bumped to Java 11 (as of c58bc33). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi folks,
As of c58bc33, Guice will require Java 11 (up from Java 8). This will apply to all future releases (past 7.0.0).
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions