You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
moving forward our primary persistence will certainly be elsewhere (firebase, a hosted Automerge node, etc)
Gist persistence is a pain: writing gists requires keeping track of a github-specific accessToken, which sometimes needs to be refreshed. The Gists api is low-traffic enough that bugs can remain active for months (example). It also makes persistence code more abstract than if we can target one primary provider.
I would maintain the ability to view gists, but saving changes would prompt a "Save.." dialog so the user could pick/modify the title and put it in their account. (TBD exactly how the UX should work but it would be the same for viewing other readonly sources, like random HTTPS:// text files or stuff on GitHub.)
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I’m considering dropping the Gist write support.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions