-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
Use Botorch MultiTaskGP for transfer learning #549
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
8fee382 to
88e1dfe
Compare
AdrianSosic
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @Hrovatin, here the first batch of comments
|
@Hrovatin would you consider abandoning this PR? I think if this topic is picked up again its better to start afresh (and only open a PR after investigations have concluded). |
|
@Scienfitz I would keep open as the main blocker for this was randomness in benchmarks. Since that may be solved now I would suggest running benchmarks again on the new HPC (need to confirm it is also reproducible there) |
|
@Hrovatin any update? |
|
No, I need to first set up testing on oneHPC to reproducibly benchmark - as that seems to be the only option to make fully reproducible. I will post update here once I have the results @Scienfitz |
8ce5fba to
bee32aa
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.
|
@AdrianSosic @Scienfitz @AVHopp Update on the comparison of MultiTask GP from botorch and current kernel:
|
AVHopp
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
First round of comments, but we should discuss some of the points (in particular the one regarding multiple active values) internally first.
de81707 to
68a9c24
Compare
AVHopp
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would be willing to approve - however, since this is technically my PR I can't
5cfb366 to
7bb49d9
Compare
|
Note to myself: Have a look at meta-pytorch/botorch#2739 (comment) |
Co-authored-by: AdrianSosic <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: AdrianSosic <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Alexander V. Hopp <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Alexander V. Hopp <[email protected]>
7a91412 to
9dc7606
Compare
The active_dims argument can now be dropped due to #671
9dc7606 to
8db6a0a
Compare


Replaces the custom
IndexKernelconstruction with BoTorch'sMultiTaskGP(which became possible due the addedall_tasksargument).