Skip to content

Status for pmatch-based analysis/tokenisation #52

Open
@snomos

Description

@snomos

Issues:

  • Ambiguous input
    • Seems to work fine
  • Ambiguous multiword expessions with ambiguous tokenisation
    • Seems to work – represented within lexc now; hfst-tokenise also
      supports forms on the analyses now
  • Ambiguous multiword expessions need reorganising after CG
    • The module cg-mwesplit takes wordforms from readings and turns them into
      new cohorts
  • Unknown words
    • The set-difference method only works for words without
      flag diacritics (even though we should be working only on the form-side?)
      and leads to binary blow-up: With only lower unknowns, we get 45M;
      lower+upper gives 67M, while no unknowns gives 27M
    • Fixed instead by treating empty analyses as unknown-tokens in
      hfst-tokenise, and outputting unmatched strings with a prefix
  • Treat input that's within superblanks as unmatched
    • probably requires a change in hfst-tokenise itself
  • Try >1 space for ambiguous MWE's? – represented within lexc now
  • Try set-difference-unknowns method with regular hfst commands?

Moved here from top of gramcheck tokeniser header.

@unhammer, @lynnda-hill - til info

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions