GScan sort running workflows before expandable (containing run dirs) workflows

[MetRonnie]

Describe the bug

At the moment, no-run-name workflows that are running are displayed before stopped non-run-name workflows, but after stopped workflows containing numbered/named run dirs.

If sorting is to be done properly, running workflows should be at the very top of the GScan sidebar.

Also, why do workflows containing run dirs come before no-run-name workflows in the sort order anyway?

Pull requests welcome!
This is an Open Source project - please consider contributing a bug fix
yourself (please read CONTRIBUTING.md before starting any work though).

[oliver-sanders]

Also, why do workflows containing run dirs come before no-run-name workflows in the sort order anyway?

I think this is just awaiting hierarchical sort to be implemented.

If sorting is to be done properly, running workflows should be at the very top of the GScan sidebar.

Yep. I think this was the plan, just not implemented yet?

Although hierarchical sort gets nasty, if you have multiple runs in a hierarchy we would expect them to stay together irrespective of their state. That messes with the sort order somewhat.

For example, what's the correct sort order for this?

a/
   a1:paused
b/
  b1:stopped
  b2:running
c:running
d:stopped

For a flat GScan it would be:

b2:running
c:running
a1:paused
b1:stopped
d:stopped

For a hierarchical GScan I think it should be:

b/
  b1:stopped  # sort up until the last level (i.e. keep the runs in order)
  b2:running
c:running
a/
   a1:paused
d:stopped

Or (my preference):

b/
  b2:running  # sort cascaded right down the hierarchy (i.e. active runs at the top)
  b1:stopped
c:running
a/
   a1:paused
d:stopped

But not:

a/
   a1:paused
b/
  b2:running
c:running
b/  # confusing as heck
  b1:stopped
d:stopped

Suggest if one workflow is running the entire hierarchy should be considered to be running (much like how if one task in a family is running the state of the family is running). And cascade the sorting from head to toe?

The approach of #736 may be useful here?

Would be nice to offer a purely alphabetical sort too.