Skip to content

[over.match.ref] Dependence of R on T2 is unclear #762

@t3nsor

Description

@t3nsor

Full name of submitter: Brian Bi

Issue description: It is not clear whether the set R defined in [over.match.ref]/1.1 is a function of T2 or is the union of the sets computed from all such T2.

Suggested resolution: Edit [over.match.ref]/1.1 as follows:

  • Let R be athe set of all types including

    • “lvalue reference to cv2 T2”lvalue reference types (when converting to an lvalue) and
    • “cv2 T2” and “rvalue reference to cv2 T2”non-reference types and rvalue reference types (when converting to an rvalue or an lvalue of function type)

    for any T2. The permissible types for non-explicit conversion functions are the members of R where having the form "cv2 T2" or "reference to cv2 T2" where “cv1 T” is reference-compatible ([dcl.init.ref]) with “cv2 T2”. For direct-initialization, the permissible types for explicit conversion functions are the members of R having the form "cv2 T2" or "reference to cv2 T2" where T2 can be converted to type T with a (possibly trivial) qualification conversion ([conv.qual]); otherwise there are none.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions