-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
Inline routing-release submodules #459
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Please also add a task for updating the routing-release pipeline. I don't think it will break, but maybe we can then get rid of some dead code. |
We briefly talked about this in the WG Forum:
It should be possible to migrate feature branches. If I find the time I will try it out and document the process should anyone have a branch in a fork they want to migrate after the inlining. |
* revert: fix: remove repos which have been inlined (#64) This reverts commit ddc516d. * ci: fix docs and submodule sync See: cloudfoundry/routing-release#459
If you had changes for one of the repos which has been inlined you can migrate them: First make sure you are on the current tip of the development branch. Inside routing-release (assuming you want to migrate
Should your change be on a fork you have to replace the URL with the URL from your fork. This will create a merge commit on your branch from which you can then open a PR to routing-release. |
Proposed Change
Instead of maintaining many repositories, inline the submodules into the release to reduce the overhead of managing multiple repositories and making changes which affect all of them.
Acceptance criteria
Less (or no) submodules.
Related links
Batch 1:
Batch 2:
Batch 3:
Remaining:
Follow-ups:
Should we inline all sub-modules, we should remove automation for it as well.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: