You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: bip-0345.mediawiki
+2-2Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ timelocked coins for perpetuity or relying on a trusted third party.
93
93
[[File:bip-0345/vaults-Basic.png|frame|center]]
94
94
95
95
Vaults in Bitcoin have been discussed formally since 2016
96
-
([http://fc16.ifca.ai/bitcoin/papers/MES16.pdf MES16]) and informally since [https://web.archive.org/web/20160220215151/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=511881.0 2014]. The value of
96
+
([https://crypto.news/app/uploads/2016/08/MES16.pdf MES16]) and informally since [https://web.archive.org/web/20160220215151/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=511881.0 2014]. The value of
97
97
having a configurable delay period with recovery capability in light of an
98
98
unexpected spend has been widely recognized.
99
99
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ unauthorized recovery transaction is limited.
393
393
394
394
== Implementation ==
395
395
396
-
A sample implementation is available on bitcoin-inquisition [https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/2023-01-opvault-inq here], with an associated [https://github.com/bitcoin-inquisition/bitcoin/pull/21 pull request].
396
+
A sample implementation is available on bitcoin-inquisition [https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/2023-02-opvault-inq here], with an associated [https://github.com/bitcoin-inquisition/bitcoin/pull/21 pull request].
0 commit comments