Updated Zealy Q4 Proposal #1073
Replies: 3 comments
-
|
I appreciate the work Piber is doing to make this program a success. I think this is a really ambitious plan! I especially love the idea of swag. Any work benefiting the community contribution program can come from the community contribution budget so that the funds for this program are strictly used in support of the zealy missions. I am totally onboard with the payment processing framework piber has been working on being used in the Akash VPN |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Nice, well done, @piber-dev |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Love this initiative and this is yet another amazing step forward the community should be taking in order to gain more adoption and excitement into the ecosystem. Totally support this and you have my vote! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Updated Zealy Q4 Proposal
Original proposal can be found here and the original Q4 proposal discussion can be found here.
After receiving your feedback over the past few days, here are some high-level changes that incorporate almost all feedback. The only feedback that we did not implement was increasing the rewards on Zealy missions. With the missions that we have had, it has been hard keeping users happy and approving only good submissions. Higher rewards will be available through contests with limited winners instead, such as game jams and contests highlighting active contributors. A majority of the responses was in favour of us having a higher misc. budget but wanted the misc. budget to be more clearly defined. The scope of the proposal was deemed by most to be good enough.
High-level overview:
Success criteria for Q4:
Key figures such as average WG/SIG participation counts, total missions completed, and total reviews done for the Contributions Program will be collected and reported on to help people gauge the success of the program but no official goals are being set for these figures.
Funding:
If the program does not pass 3 revisions of a proposal or is inactive for 3 months, all funds will get returned just as mentioned in the Q3 proposal. Budgets do not mix with each other and will not roll over to the next month. We always base budgets in dollar amounts, prioritizing role budgets, so AKT being spent may vary over the months. The one exception is that we use the budget to create deposits for the proposals. A 10% buffer will be added to the proposal and a 5% conversion fee will be added to fiat payments such as the role payments.
Timeline
Since we do not want the program to stop running, we are going on-chain again on Monday. Thanks for getting involved in the discussion quickly now that the last proposal did not pass. In the future, it would be great to have all opinions be written publicly on the discussion or mentioned in the SIG-community call or the Steering Committee call so that feedback can be worked on directly, without rushing the proposal. Keep in mind that we are open towards changing the program with your feedback as time goes on, we are happy to change the program to fit into what the community wants it to be.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions