Transition to pyproject. #20
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Author
|
Hi @vtermanis could you please help take a look when you are available? |
Contributor
|
Hi @trivialfis - thanks for the PR! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, this PR adds support for packaging py-ubjson with
pyproject.toml. Please see https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/guides/writing-pyproject-toml/ for details about pyproject.setuptoolscontinues to be used as the build backend.We are running into an issue with installing py-ubjson due to missing setuptools in isolated environments. Using pyproject can help direct the build tool like pip to install setuptools. Besides, pyproject is considered to be the standard Python packaging method now.
py3.12 is not listed in the classifier due to #19 .