Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link

@renovate renovate bot commented Oct 15, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
coverage ==7.12.0 -> ==7.13.0 age confidence

Release Notes

coveragepy/coveragepy (coverage)

v7.13.0

Compare Source

  • Feature: coverage.py now supports :file:.coveragerc.toml configuration
    files. These files use TOML syntax and take priority over
    :file:pyproject.toml but lower priority than :file:.coveragerc files.
    Closes issue 1643_ thanks to Olena Yefymenko <pull 1952_>_.

  • Fix: we now include a permanent .pth file which is installed with the code,
    fixing issue 2084. In 7.12.1b1 this was done incorrectly: it didn't work
    when using the source wheel (py3-none-any). This is now fixed. Thanks,
    Henry Schreiner <pull 2100_>
    .

  • Deprecated: when coverage.py is installed, it creates three command entry
    points: coverage, coverage3, and coverage-3.10 (if installed for
    Python 3.10). The second and third of these are not needed and will
    eventually be removed. They still work for now, but print a message about
    their deprecation.

.. _issue 1643: #​1643
.. _pull 1952: #​1952
.. _pull 2100: #​2100

.. _changes_7-12-1b1:


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency coverage to v7.11.0 chore(deps): update dependency coverage to v7.11.1 Nov 7, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/coverage-7.x branch from bb9701e to 8968abb Compare November 7, 2025 14:03
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency coverage to v7.11.1 chore(deps): update dependency coverage to v7.11.2 Nov 8, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/coverage-7.x branch from 8968abb to d26363d Compare November 8, 2025 21:02
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency coverage to v7.11.2 chore(deps): update dependency coverage to v7.11.3 Nov 10, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/coverage-7.x branch from d26363d to 9bcf4d8 Compare November 10, 2025 02:36
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency coverage to v7.11.3 chore(deps): update dependency coverage to v7.12.0 Nov 19, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/coverage-7.x branch from 9bcf4d8 to 2311b35 Compare November 19, 2025 00:49
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency coverage to v7.12.0 chore(deps): update dependency coverage to v7.12.0 - autoclosed Dec 8, 2025
@renovate renovate bot closed this Dec 8, 2025
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/coverage-7.x branch December 8, 2025 08:46
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency coverage to v7.12.0 - autoclosed chore(deps): update dependency coverage to v7.13.0 Dec 8, 2025
@renovate renovate bot reopened this Dec 8, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/coverage-7.x branch 2 times, most recently from 2311b35 to cb232f7 Compare December 8, 2025 13:56
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Dec 8, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #17 will not alter performance

Comparing renovate/coverage-7.x (cb232f7) with master (86035d1)

Summary

✅ 63 untouched
⏩ 63 skipped1

Footnotes

  1. 63 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@BobTheBuidler BobTheBuidler merged commit cc9c014 into master Dec 8, 2025
7 of 26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants