Skip to content

[Feature Request]: Newer version of Python #16907

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
1 task done
siakc opened this issue Mar 20, 2025 · 2 comments
Open
1 task done

[Feature Request]: Newer version of Python #16907

siakc opened this issue Mar 20, 2025 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@siakc
Copy link

siakc commented Mar 20, 2025

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues and checked the recent builds/commits

What would your feature do ?

I was getting a little bit of help from Arch Linux community and when they saw I am installing Python 310 they frowned. I argued: "Big apps can't really catch up that fast to newer versions of libraries they are using. It break compatibility in nasty ways and there is tradeoff between fixing that and other stuff"
They said: "That argument falls kinda flat being python 310 is dead and eol for nearly 2 years already and even things like blender are on python 3.13"

Proposed workflow

I is a software dependency related issue.

Additional information

No response

@siakc siakc added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 20, 2025
@jagauthier
Copy link

https://devguide.python.org/versions/

Python 3.10 doesn't EOL until 2026.

@KickAssDave
Copy link

I did manage to get the whole thing working on a 5090 with Python 3.12... however, not without blood, sweat and tears..
If you are prepared to manually modify filenames, wait for your computer to compile flash attention wheels (that took 5 hours on a 9800X3D) and wanting to go through LOADS of .py files and manually modify very specific lines due to incompatibilities between old python code and new code... be my guest :P

Otherwise, stick to the version advised or wait for the guys that created this and other modules to update everything :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants